If your photo renders on a website, it's copyable, and while photographers naturally like to control how their images are copied, remixed, used, (re)presented and even sold, the social-media & copy/paste culture can do a number on your original image.
On the front lines of the fight for correct attribution is Paulo Ordoveza, the man behind the "PicPedant" twitter account, who consistently fights for proper attribution and against faked, photoshopped images presented as the real thing. He calls himself a "punctilious internet killjoy at the forefront of the New Debunkonomy" which just about sums it up.
PicPedant is metaphorically running up the hill of Erik Kessels' "24 hours of Photos" installation; for each debunked or correctly attributed photo, thousands are sliding beneath his feet.
PicPedant fight-the-fight for the last year or so, and today, came across an extraordinary photograph (of dubious origins) that was being widely shared. I figured I'd take my own stab at debunking (and uncovering) the real source.
On Monday, Tim Brannigan, a writer from Ireland, tweeted a photo:
And in case you missed it, a panoramic photo taken while rolling down a hill. pic.twitter.com/8HdZNjso3l— Tim Brannigan (@tim_brannigan) May 25, 2015
I saw the photo over on stellar.io a "fave-aggregator" kind of place, and the caption caught my eye - surely it was in jest, but many of Brannigan's followers were reposting the photo with the same caption, and while it's a great photo, I've never seen a mobile panorama taken with such clarity and seamlessness.
Spoiler: click to reveal original source!
From here, I clicked-through Brannigan's tweet to reveal the location of the embedded jpg. I copied its location: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CF39ejdWMAM_EgE.jpg:large and pasted-it into (reverse) Google Image search. If you mouse-over the camera at the right of the Google Images search box, you have the option for Google to search for pictures on the internet that resemble a picture from your hard drive, or pictures on the internet that resemble each other.
a reddit discussion of the photo, and buried in the thread was a comment from seymour47 that said: "Shouldn't the note about the title be changed from 'Misleading title' to stolen from someone's website with no credit given?"
seymour47 linked to the original source, "an award-winning director and surrealist photographer based in New York City" named Randy Scott Slavin who has an entire project of these circular views called "Alternate Perspectives".
Thanks, seymour47, picpedant (who was hot on this exact same case yesterday), Oscar Bartos (who alerted Brannigan to the original source 12 hrs ago), and big thanks to Randy Scott Slavin for his stirring digital composite!
(All of this came to mind in large part thanks to Rob Fee's brilliant look last week at joke stealing on twitter, and the latest Richard Prince Instagram kerfuffle...)